Changes between Version 19 and Version 20 of BluePrintDecisionMaking
- Timestamp:
- 09/21/09 18:09:44 (16 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
BluePrintDecisionMaking
v19 v20 8 8 === Definitions === 9 9 10 '''Phase I'''- will be used to refer to the first build of the system. This is testing how all of the functionality play together and tests to see if, together this improves group decision making ability in an online asynchronous environment. 10 '''Phase I'''- will be used to refer to the first build of the system. This is testing how all of the functionality play together and tests to see if, together this improves group decision making ability in an online asynchronous environment. This is what's due in October. 11 11 12 12 '''Subjects''' will be used synonymously with Users and Experts. This is created for Experts who are Users of the system and Subjects of the study. 13 13 14 '''List''' a list is a problem that is created by someone with this permission. This is not required for Phase I due Oct. Only one discussion will be going on and this is presented to a User group who will all have the same permissions. 15 16 '''Item''' an item is a solution offered to a problem (List). Users need to be able to add an Item to the List in Phase I. 17 14 18 === User Stories === 15 1.Propose a new option to consider[[BR]]16 19 17 2.Comment on any option proposed[[BR]] 20 Faculty, staff and students are going to conduct a threat assessment for their campus. These users can interact anytime and from anywhere there is an Internet connection and a browser. The user can: 18 21 19 3.Vote on a relative comparison of any two options[[BR]]20 22 21 4.View the votes to find both disagreements and agreements[[BR]]23 1.Propose a new option to consider that is added to a List.[[BR]] 22 24 23 5.Change their votes based upon discussion feedback and new options[[BR]]25 2.Comment on any option proposed in a discussion forum - plain text, Linear-Blog, comments should be editable (for 30 minutes after creation or something like that) [[BR]] 24 26 25 6.View a linear interval scale for the options based upon current votes[[BR]]27 3.Vote on a relative comparison of any two options, all options should be available from which to choose on one screen. will provide screenshot idea of interface solution. Once subgroup is selected, then each item needs to be compared with the other items as paired comparisons. (can force Usersto complete all available pairs so that the calculation is easier)[[BR]] 26 28 27 7.View a modified interval scale based upon the missing votes for any options showing the degree of uncertainty in the relative position of an item in the scale resulting from those that have already voted.[[BR]] 29 4.View the votes to find both disagreements and agreements using the scale[[BR]] 30 31 5.Change their votes. no need to maintain individual old vote. but a 'quality control check' needs to be run to test for any cyclic triad where A is selected over B, B is selected over C, and C is selected over A. error message to User asking them to correct. [[BR]] 32 33 6.View a linear interval scale for the options based upon current votes as calculated from the Unit Normal Table.[[BR]] 34 35 7.View a modified interval scale based upon the missing votes for any options showing the degree of uncertainty in the relative position of an item in the scale resulting from those that have already voted.One scale showing worst case scenario (lower boundary) and another scale showing best case (upper boundary). [[BR]] 36 37 So, three scales are required for Phase I: [[BR]] 38 1) present calculation based on those who have voted[[BR]] 39 2) scale of best case scenario (calculation in technical requirements) 40 3) scale of vote giving worst case scenario of non-voting members 28 41 29 42
